Disasters and “destruktionsglädje”
In one of your earlier essays, you examined the short story “The Fillyjonk Who Believed in Disasters” from the collection Tales of the Moominvalley (1962), about a very anxious fillyjonk—one of the many species/characters populating the valley—who sees her fear of natural disasters coming true. When the Fillyjonk encounters the tornado, she thinks, “Oh, my beautiful, wonderful disaster.” After it has destroyed her home and taken her belongings, she reflects enthusiastically, “Now I’m free; now I can do anything.” For her, catastrophe is a liberating force. If we read the Tales just as Fillyjonk reads the world, we might assume that catastrophic events depicted in the story could have a similar effect on the reader: “I’m still reading; I’ve done it; I’m free; I got through the catastrophe”. Do the Moomins, who deal with a whole series of catastrophes—like the comet (Comet in Moominland, 1946), the flood (The Moomins and the Great Flood, 1945), the winter, way too much winter (Moominland Midwinter, 1957)—suggest a more liberating mode of reception and reading?
There’s always the possibility of reading metaphorically, or just thinking about natural catastrophes, which is exciting and something you might never experience. Isn’t it interesting to think about what would happen? In one of her essays Tove Jansson writes about “destruktionsglädje” (joy of destruction), about how a child’s sense of “destruktionsglädje” can be positive. You can imagine a huge wave, for example. She didn’t write about this in relation to war or our climate crisis, but rather to a very big rain or snowstorm where you can’t open the door anymore. You’d have to stay inside for a week. How exciting that would be! But it’s more like fantasy, a mere idea.
Jansson was interested in phenomena like great storms and ships on the waves, as well as comets. She probably experienced the threat of nuclear war as well. It is, of course, possible to read Jansson’s works in the context of man-made disasters. But I think it would be wrong to think only of war in relation to the first Moomin books.
Coming back to Fillyjonk and to the image of her leaning towards the storm: At first, the text is full of expressions like she runs into her pantry and hides, “she rolled herself into her quilt”, saying things like “I know everything will turn out badly”. But when the catastrophe comes, there’s this sudden liberation and a combination of two movements, of contraction and release. Jansson teaches us to also see the liberating side of things. If you manage to get through a snowstorm, for example, that’s a small catastrophe you’re experiencing, like Moomintroll in Moominland Midwinter (1957) when he’s really up against a snowstorm, but suddenly he realises he can turn around and just fly with it.
Dance as an interruptive force
You discussed the different roles that choreographed scenes play in Tove Jansson’s work, referencing the history of modern dance from Rudolf von Laban to Martha Graham. To some extent, the Moomin dance scenes serve a similar purpose to disasters in that they disrupt the progression of events simply by occurring unexpectedly. Could you perhaps say something about the ‘interactive’ force of dance and narration in relation to the ‘interactive’ force of nature depicted in Jansson’s books?
I think it is really like that. But dance as a force, as something that is actually happening, is difficult to put into words. It can change the direction of something, providing a sense of liberation and changing the mood.
In Jansson’s autobiographical short story “The Bays” (“Havsvikarna”, in Bildhuggarens dotter, 1968), she describes how, as a child, she used to walk from bay to bay in Pellinki, an archipelago not very far from Helsinki, at 4 o’clock in the morning. She goes to a bay full of reeds and touches them. They move and make all these sounds, and she becomes one of them. I think that’s beautiful. But I don’t know if you could compare that to a disaster that changes things. It’s a significant event to experience that kind of dance, a dance of nature, where you literally immerse yourself in nature and dance with it.
Dancing outside, and even detached from music, marks an important threshold in the history of modern dance (and has its fallacies as well), for example with Rudolf von Laban’s and Mary Wigman’s famous dance studies on the beach of the Lago Maggiore in the 1910s. I was curious about your mention of a certain change over time in Tove Jansson’s work in your lecture today. In the 1960s she tended to include in her books more improvisation in dance and less formalized styles like tango, samba, or else. Is there a correlation whereby the plot also changes towards a more diverse structure? You said that some critics felt there were too many narratives.
Two things are happening at the same time already in Jansson’s Moomin books. We can consider how the characters fit into the landscape. In the early books, they look at the landscape. It is kind of framed. Landscape is described as something you gaze at or admire or are impressed by, or a setting for an adventure.
From around Moominland Midwinter (1957) onwards, the landscape and the movement of landscapes starts to go through the characters. They become something else. The Moomintroll needs to go low as the heather is growing, suddenly, a tree starts moving, the sand is escaping. One could refer to Shakespeare’s Macbeth or the cinema of Akira Kurosawa. It’s like the whole island is full of contractions and releases.
At the same time, in her writing and art, Jansson cuts out the details, avoiding too many adjectives and too many words in general, as well as too many colours. She makes everything more plain. In her visual art, there’s increasingly room for abstraction, although she only started creating non-figurative art in the late 1960s. All these things are connected. In almost every book, she challenged herself by using different techniques.